Mardiana (2012) PRFruSEF PRINSIP TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITAS DALAM RANGKA MEWUJUDKAN TATA PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK (GOOD GOVERNANCE) PADA INSPEKTORAT PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN. Masters thesis, Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar.
![[thumbnail of Sampul & Pengesahan.pdf]](https://eprints.stialanmakassar.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Sampul & Pengesahan.pdf
Download (258kB)
![[thumbnail of Kata Pengantar,Abstrak,Daftar Isi,Daftar Tabel,Daftar Gambar.pdf]](https://eprints.stialanmakassar.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Kata Pengantar,Abstrak,Daftar Isi,Daftar Tabel,Daftar Gambar.pdf
Download (162kB)
![[thumbnail of BAB 1, 2, 3, 4, dan 5.pdf]](https://eprints.stialanmakassar.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
BAB 1, 2, 3, 4, dan 5.pdf
Download (856kB)
![[thumbnail of Daftar Pustaka.pdf]](https://eprints.stialanmakassar.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Daftar Pustaka.pdf
Download (175kB)
![[thumbnail of Riwayat Hidup Penulis.pdf]](https://eprints.stialanmakassar.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Riwayat Hidup Penulis.pdf
Download (180kB)
Abstract
The main problem analysed in the study was about good governance. The iolective of the study was to understand and analyse principles of ;ansparency and accountability to make good governance in the inspectorate
affice of South Sulawesi province.
Tle study applied a descriptive qualitative method. The data for the study *ere collected through interviews, observation, and document study. The key irrformants of the study included the head of inspectorate office of South Su,r{awesi province, the head of sub-department of planning, the head of subaepartrnent evaluation and reporting, the head of sub-department of a:rninistration and general affairs, the inspector of area l, and auditors. The rr;b{h was also selected as informants for the study. There were 11 rymants altogether involved in the study. *ie results of the study showed that information in the inspectorate was m?sparent although was not yet maximal in which the information channel nas stll effective and public access to information was still limited. Public :rn'.riaints mechanism was not maximal due to lack of dissemintaion about t-e :omplaints mechanisms. The performance accountability was also less rruunfiUs in which accountability mechanism was not run well. The :r-m€rrles and benefits were not achieved, and the people complaints were -rr Esppnded.
Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
---|---|
Subjects: | Tesis > 2012 Tesis |
Depositing User: | Teknologi Informasi |
Date Deposited: | 04 Sep 2024 02:26 |
Last Modified: | 04 Sep 2024 02:26 |
URI: | https://eprints.stialanmakassar.ac.id/id/eprint/2034 |